Figure 1: Design hierarchical IPv4 and IPv6 addressing schemes to meet addressing requirements
(Source: CISCO)
It is actually a Design of the IPv4 & IPv6 Architecture (Akter, M.S. and Hossain, 2019.). The objective of the Design hierarchical IPv4 and IPv6 addressing schemes to meet addressing fulfilled. Here two pc has been used with IP address of 209.165.200.225, 209.165.200.229 respectively.
Figure 2: Configure RIPv2 with simple route redistribution for IPv4
(Source: CISCO)
It is basically the configuration of RIPv2 with the help of IPv4 Configuration.
Figure 3: Configure floating default static routes for conditional redundancy at the ISP.
(Source: CISCO)
It is basically the configuration of floating static Routes.
Figure 4: IP Configuration on PC1
(Source: CISCO)
Figure 5: IP Configuration on PC2
(Source: CISCO)
Figure 6: Design of IPv4
(Source: CISCO)
Figure 7: Successful Route Setup
(Source: CISCO)
It defines that the route setup is successful and data transfer from one pc to another is perfectly working (Ashraf, Z. and Yousaf, M., 2016). It can be understood from the above figure that message is received from one to PC to another pc, no packet is not reject, the level of loss is 0%. 4 packets were sent all four packets are received to the pc2 end.
Figure 8: Ping of PC1
(Source: CISCO)
Figure 9: Ping of PC2
(Source: CISCO)
From these ping results it defines that the connection between two PC is perfectly done.
Figure 10: Static Routing
(Source: CISCO)
The main objective is to form the static route among the router 1, router2 and the router3 (Dhanapal, A. and Nithyanandam, P., 2018). The configuration is successfully set up. Here router type ‘1941’ has been used.
Bibliography
Journals
Akter, M.S. and Hossain, M.A., 2019. Analysis and Comparative Study for Developing Computer Network in Terms of Routing Protocols Having IPv6 Network Using Cisco Packet Tracer. Software Engineering, 7(2), p.16.
Ashraf, Z. and Yousaf, M., 2016. SECURE INTER-VLAN IPv6 ROUTING: IMPLEMENTATION & EVALUATION. Science International, 28(3).
Ashraf, Z. and Yousaf, M., 2017. Optimized routing information exchange in hybrid IPv4-IPv6 network using OSPFV3 & EIGRPv6. IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(4).
Bedi, P. and Dua, A., 2020. Network Steganography using the Overflow Field of Timestamp Option in an IPv4 Packet. Procedia Computer Science, 171, pp.1810-1818.
Dhanapal, A. and Nithyanandam, P., 2018. AN OVERVIEW OF THE IPV6 ADDRESSING SCHEME. International Journal of Mathematics, Game Theory, and Algebra, 27(1), pp.81-92.
Diwan, D., Narang, V.K. and Singh, A.K., 2017. Security mechanism in RIPv2, EIGRP and OSPF for campus network-a review. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Trends Technol. IJCST, 5(2).
El Khadiri, K., Labouidya, O., Elkamoun, N. and Hilal, R., 2018. Performance evaluation of IPv4/IPv6 transition mechanisms for real-time applications using OPNET modeler. Performance Evaluation, 9(4).
El Khadiri, K., Labouidya, O., Elkamoun, N. and Hilal, R., 2018. Performance analysis of video conferencing over various IPv4/IPv6 transition mechanisms. IJCSNS, 18(7), pp.83-88.
Enache, D. and Alexandru, M., 2016. A Study of the Technology Transition from IPv4 to IPv6 for an ISP. Review of the Air Force Academy, (1), p.117.
Gredler, H., Juniper Networks Inc, 2017. BGP link-state extensions for segment routing. U.S. Patent 9,660,897.
Haji, M.I., ESGS, S.P. and Arifin, S.P., 2018. Analysis Tunneling IPv4 and IPv6 on VoIP Network. Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, 3(4), pp.337-344.
Hossain, M.A., Podder, D., Jahan, S. and Hussain, M., 2016. Performance Analysis of Three Transition Mechanisms between IPv6 Network and IPv4 Network: Dual Stack, Tunneling and Translation. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 20(1), pp.217-228.
IZEM, A., WAKRIM, M. and GHADI, A., Logical model of Autonomous System implementing IPv6 addressing.
Ashraf, Z. and Yousaf, M., 2017. Optimized routing information exchange in hybrid IPv4-IPv6 network using OSPFV3 & EIGRPv6. IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(4).
Lucas, T., Ferreira, M., Plachta, R., Ferreira, G. and Costa, K., 2020. Non-Fragmented Network Flow Design Analysis: Comparison IPv4 with IPv6 Using Path MTU Discovery. Computers, 9(2), p.54.
Makeri, Y.A., 2019. DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF OPTIMIZED FEATURES IN A LOCAL AREA NETWORK FOR IMPROVEDENTERPRISENETWORK. GSJ, 7(7).
Mollick, P., Biswas, S., Halder, A. and Salmani, M., 2016. Mikrotik Router Configuration using IPv6. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer, 4(2), pp.2001-2007.
Rietz, R., Cwalinski, R., König, H. and Brinner, A., 2018. An SDN-based approach to ward off LAN attacks. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, 2018.
Sahu, A., A Study of Multicast Routing on IPv4 and IPv6 (Protocol) in LAN Networks.
Thu, D.K.A., 2018. Simulation of Campus Area Network using routing protocols. International Journal for Advance Research and Development, 3(9), pp.55-59.