# Hasty Generalization: How to Avoid This Fallacy in Your Writing?

Students frequently commit many fallacies when writing academic papers. False or
unsupported evidence or reasoning used to support a claim is referred to as a fallacy. One of
the most typical mistakes that students make that results in them receiving a low grade for
their papers is a hasty generalization. Rarely, rapid generalization can result in a completely
inaccurate document. For this reason, a brief primer on hasty generalization and how to avoid

What is a Generalization that is Hasty?
A fallacy known as a hasty generalization occurs when a certain conclusion is reached
without taking into account all available evidence. Simply put, erroneous thinking that results
from jumping to conclusions after using flawed, insufficient, or incorrect reasoning is known
as haste reasoning. Thus, conclusions reached based on false information might be referred
to as erroneous or hasty reasoning.
When students jump to quick conclusions, they fail to consider all the other facets of their
case. Let’s now explore a little more into the causes of erroneous generalization.
a. Hasty introduction of the currently available information
b. Arguments or facts that stand alone as false
d. Statistics errors or incompleteness fallacies
d. Myths about insufficient sample sizes
e. Converse-related injuries
Researchers are frequently advised to avoid making hasty conclusions when conducting
scientific research. Similar to this, though, students must exercise the utmost caution when
generalizations frequently are completely inaccurate or receive a low mark.

What is the Example of Hasty Generalization?

This can occur in various situations that are listed below:

1. Reliance that is on sample sizes that are small-
Let’s say your younger sister, who is in the fifth grade, enjoys watching NBA. You could
claim that young females generally follow the NBA. This would be a case of premature
generalization, though. You didn’t take into account other people’s ages or genders; instead,

2. Reasoning that is faulty inductive-
Imagine that when you get home, your child is feeling guilty and that colored pencils have
been used to mark the walls. Naturally, your first assumption will be that your youngster
painted the walls. But doing so can constitute a type of rash generalization in which you draw
conclusions from a limited amount of data.

3. Fallacy that is silundum quid-
This is an additional illustration of a hasty generalization where a logical sequence is reversed
to arrive at a certain conclusion. Let’s say your sister like Cartoon Network. Consequently,
you may assert that NBA viewers also enjoy cartoons. However, if you reversed the remark
and said that fans of comic books also enjoy watching basketball, your claim would be
incorrect.

The problem with making generalizations that are Hasty-
When you write in haste, your conclusion is more likely to contain a number of errors. If you
do this, your entire response may end up being inaccurate. Other than these, premature